Choose the correct answer for each question.

1. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'reason' is a mere restatement of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as reason and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The reason and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a reason is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

2. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'reason' is a mere restatement of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as reason and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The reason and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a reason is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

3. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'reason' is a mere restatement of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as reason and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The reason and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a reason is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

4. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'reason' is a mere restatement of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as reason and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The reason and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a reason is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

5. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'reason' is a mere restatement of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as reason and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The reason and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a reason is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

6. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'reason' is a mere restatement of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as reason and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The reason and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a reason is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

7. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'objection' is a mere denial of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as objection and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The objection and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a objection is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

8. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'objection' is a mere denial of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as objection and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The objection and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a objection is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

9. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

   1.   ?    The 'objection' is a mere denial of the conclusion.
   2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
   3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
   4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as objection and conclusion.
   5.   ?    The objection and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a objection is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
   6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.

10. What, if anything, is wrong with this argument map?

    1.   ?    The 'objection' is a mere denial of the conclusion.
    2.   ?    At least one claim box contains reasoning.
    3.   ?    At least one claim box does not contain a full declarative sentence.
    4.   ?    The map does not represent reasoning: the claims are not related as objection and conclusion.
    5.   ?    The objection and conclusion have been switched around so that what appears as a objection is in fact the conclusion and vice versa.
    6.   ?    There is nothing wrong with this argument map.