<% ' FP_ASP ASP Automatically generated by a FrontPage Component. Do not Edit. On Error Resume Next Session("FP_OldCodePage") = Session.CodePage Session("FP_OldLCID") = Session.LCID Session.CodePage = 1252 Session.LCID = 1033 Err.Clear strErrorUrl = "" If Request.ServerVariables("REQUEST_METHOD") = "POST" Then If Request.Form("VTI-GROUP") = "0" Then Err.Clear Set fp_conn = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection") FP_DumpError strErrorUrl, "Cannot create connection" Set fp_rs = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset") FP_DumpError strErrorUrl, "Cannot create record set" fp_conn.Open Application("comments_ConnectionString") FP_DumpError strErrorUrl, "Cannot open database" fp_rs.Open "Results", fp_conn, 1, 3, 2 ' adOpenKeySet, adLockOptimistic, adCmdTable FP_DumpError strErrorUrl, "Cannot open record set" fp_rs.AddNew FP_DumpError strErrorUrl, "Cannot add new record set to the database" Dim arFormFields0(3) Dim arFormDBFields0(3) Dim arFormValues0(3) arFormFields0(0) = "Comment" arFormDBFields0(0) = "Comment" arFormValues0(0) = Request("Comment") arFormFields0(1) = "Name" arFormDBFields0(1) = "Name" arFormValues0(1) = Request("Name") arFormFields0(2) = "Page" arFormDBFields0(2) = "Page" arFormValues0(2) = Request("Page") FP_SaveFormFields fp_rs, arFormFields0, arFormDBFields0 FP_SaveFieldToDB fp_rs, Now, "Date" If Request.ServerVariables("REMOTE_USER") <> "" Then FP_SaveFieldToDB fp_rs, Request.ServerVariables("REMOTE_USER"), "User_name" End If fp_rs.Update FP_DumpError strErrorUrl, "Cannot update the database" fp_rs.Close fp_conn.Close FP_FormConfirmation "text/html; charset=windows-1252",_ "Form Confirmation",_ "Thank you for submitting the following information:",_ "missing_layers.asp",_ "Return to the form." End If End If Session.CodePage = Session("FP_OldCodePage") Session.LCID = Session("FP_OldLCID") %> 4.10 Missing Layers
Home / Tutorial 4

Sometimes arguments are presented with a whole layer missing between the evidence and the contention.


There is a sizeable gap between the objection and the contention. One sign of a big gap is that the Rabbit rule is not satisfied at all, i.e., there is no overlap in significant terms or concepts between the contention and the objection. 

The argument is really a multi-layer argument, but a layer does not currently appear on the map.

One way to fix this "missing layer" problem. Notice that the objection has become supporting evidence for a higher-level objection.


Another way to fix the problem. In this case the objection is treated as providing evidence against a reason to believe that the astronauts did land on the Moon.

[Comments_Template/intro.htm] <% if 0 then %> <% end if %> <% fp_sQry="SELECT * FROM Results WHERE (Page = 'T4_missing_layers')" fp_sDefault="" fp_sNoRecords="no comments yet" fp_sDataConn="comments" fp_iMaxRecords=256 fp_iCommandType=1 fp_iPageSize=0 fp_fTableFormat=False fp_fMenuFormat=False fp_sMenuChoice="Comment" fp_sMenuValue="Comment" fp_iDisplayCols=2 fp_fCustomQuery=False BOTID=0 fp_iRegion=BOTID %>

By: <%=FP_FieldVal(fp_rs,"Name")%>


Your name (optional):


 Glossary | Contents

Copyright Austhink 2003-2006

 Last updated 28-Aug-2007